Post by account_disabled on Mar 14, 2024 6:52:11 GMT
Why offer an answer only to the rider and not to the physiotherapist who works as a false freelancer? Or to the graphic designer, or to the salesperson, or to the journalist, or to the teacher...? It doesn't make sense." Carlos Gutiérrez Calderón, Secretary of Youth and New Realities of Work of CCOO, calls on the Government to promote an in-depth legal reform that puts an end to the fraud of false self-employed workers, "with all the fraud," he says, extending the application of the law of work "against those who seek to restrict it. Nuevatribuna.es | For the first time, the Supreme Court has declared the employment relationship of a Glovo worker. What would you highlight about this sentence? Carlos Gutierrez | Numerous Labor Inspection minutes and court rulings have established that the relationship between digital delivery platforms and delivery drivers is labor-related.
These workers must be protected by both individual and collective rights that appear in our regulations. After some ruling to the contrary, the Supreme Court confirms it, taking a step AOL Email List that we believe should be definitive, although there are still some cases pending in the Supreme Court. Digital delivery platforms must comply with the law and assume their labor and social responsibilities. In any case, the ruling of the TS limits the scope of regulation to digital platforms (riders), but the dimension of the problem is much greater. What other sectors use the figure of the false self-employed? Indeed, the problem far transcends the scope of digital platforms . A few days ago an interview with the worker, the rider , who won against Glovo in the Supreme Court, was published in digital media.
This person pointed out that this is not only happening in the delivery sector. And he gave the example of his son, a physiotherapist, who worked as a freelancer in a private hospital and had a schedule and had to clock in. White and bottled. I very much agree with him. This fraud is not new but it is spreading like an oil spill through more and more sectors of activity. It is not something exclusive to digital delivery platforms, far from it. The appropriate question would almost begin to be which sectors are still safe from this type of fraudulent behavior. This fraud places hundreds of thousands of workers vulnerable and unprotected and withholds very large resources from Social Security. Have you quantified approximately the number of workers who are in this situation.
These workers must be protected by both individual and collective rights that appear in our regulations. After some ruling to the contrary, the Supreme Court confirms it, taking a step AOL Email List that we believe should be definitive, although there are still some cases pending in the Supreme Court. Digital delivery platforms must comply with the law and assume their labor and social responsibilities. In any case, the ruling of the TS limits the scope of regulation to digital platforms (riders), but the dimension of the problem is much greater. What other sectors use the figure of the false self-employed? Indeed, the problem far transcends the scope of digital platforms . A few days ago an interview with the worker, the rider , who won against Glovo in the Supreme Court, was published in digital media.
This person pointed out that this is not only happening in the delivery sector. And he gave the example of his son, a physiotherapist, who worked as a freelancer in a private hospital and had a schedule and had to clock in. White and bottled. I very much agree with him. This fraud is not new but it is spreading like an oil spill through more and more sectors of activity. It is not something exclusive to digital delivery platforms, far from it. The appropriate question would almost begin to be which sectors are still safe from this type of fraudulent behavior. This fraud places hundreds of thousands of workers vulnerable and unprotected and withholds very large resources from Social Security. Have you quantified approximately the number of workers who are in this situation.